LONDON – Dubai’s ruler, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al – Maktoum, inflicted ‘exorbitant’ domestic abuse against his ex – wife, a senor British judge has concluded as he awarded her sole responsibility for looking after their children.
The ruling caps the end of an extraordinary, bitter and hugely expensive three – year custody battle at the High Court in London between Mohammed and his former wife, Princess Haya bint al – Hussein, half – sister of Jordan’s King Abdullah.
A statement issued on behalf of Sheikh Mohammed said he loved his children and would always provide for them. ‘He maintains his denial of the allegations mande in these contentious proceedings’, it said.
The cas has included revelations of kidnappings, death threats, the princess’s affair with a bodyguard, blackmail, spying, and sophisticated phone hacking set against a background of mansions, expensive clothes, millions of dollars of jewellery and race horses.
The London court has previously ruled the Dubai ruler had made Haya fear for her life, had abducted and mistreated two of his daughters by another marriage, and had ordered the phones of Haya and her lawyers, one a British lawmaker, to be hacked using the state security software ‘Pegasus’.
It has also determined that Mohammed, the vice president and prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, must provide a British record of more 554 million pounds ($730.50 million) for the children’s long – term security and maintenance.
In his final ruling, Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division in England and Wales, said Mohammed has ‘consistently displayed coercive and controlling behaviour’, against family members who defied his will.
‘Although conducted on a scale which is entirely outside the ordinary circumstances of cases heard in the Family Court in this jurisdiction, the father’s behaviors towards the mother of his children is ‘domestic abuse’, McFarlane said.
‘COERCIVE AND CONTROLLING’
Haya thanked the British judicial system and said she would raise her children to respect the traditions of both of their countries of origin. ‘Jalila, Zayed and I are not pawns to be used for division’, she said in a statement.
The publication of the welfare decision on Thursday marks the conclusion of the case which has cost well over 70 million pounds in lawyers’ fees, described by McFarlane as ‘truly enormous legal costs’.
The judge said Mohammed, who runs the Godolphin horse – racing operation, was a father who loved his two children, and that they in turn loved him.
But he criticised the sheikh’s behaviour and his refusal to even acknowledge his ex – wife’s role in caring for the children.
‘His Highness’s behaviour towards the mother…whether by threats, poems, coordinating press reports, covertly arranging to purchase property immediately overlooking hers, phone – hacking or in the conduct of this litigation, has been abusive to a high, indeed exorbitant, degree’, McFarlane said.
‘Despite the court’s findings, in no respect has His Highness accepted that any of this behaviour has either taken place or that he has had any part in orchestrating it’.
The sheikh has played no part in the court proceedings.
The saga between the royals began shortly after Haya fled to Britain in April 2019, fearing for her safety following the discovery she was having an affair with a bodyguard.
She was later blackmailed by four members of her security tem while the sheikh orchestrated a campaign of intimidation against her, and then later hacked her phone and those of her lawyer, previous court findings have shown.
The rulings against Mohammed appear not to have affected his international standing or relations between Britain, Dubai and the UAE.
The oil – rich Gulf state pledged last September to invest 10 billion pounds ($13.6 billion) in the British clean energy, infrastructure, technology and life science, and Prime Minister Boris Johnson on a visit to Abu Dhabi last week described it as a key international partner.